Jordan Peterson and Critical Race Theory: A Critique

Photo of author

By Lucy Hartford

Jordan Peterson and Critical Race Theory: A Critique

Jordan Peterson and Critical Race Theory: A Critique


Jordan Peterson, a Canadian psychologist and professor, has gained significant attention in recent years for his controversial views on various social and political issues. One topic that Peterson has been particularly critical of is Critical Race Theory (CRT). In this article, we will explore the key arguments put forth by Peterson against CRT and provide a critique of his perspective.

Understanding Critical Race Theory

Critical Race Theory is an academic framework that emerged in the 1970s and 1980s as a response to the limitations of traditional legal analysis in addressing racial inequality. It seeks to examine how race and racism intersect with other forms of oppression, such as class and gender, to perpetuate systemic discrimination.

Proponents of CRT argue that racism is not just an individual act of prejudice, but a deeply ingrained feature of society that is embedded in institutions and structures. They believe that dismantling racism requires a comprehensive understanding of how power dynamics and social structures perpetuate racial inequality.

Jordan Peterson’s Critique

Jordan Peterson has been a vocal critic of Critical Race Theory, arguing that it is a dangerous ideology that promotes division and undermines individual freedom. He believes that CRT focuses too much on group identity and fails to recognize the importance of individual responsibility and merit.

Peterson argues that CRT perpetuates a victim mentality, where individuals are encouraged to see themselves as oppressed or oppressors based solely on their race. He believes that this approach undermines personal agency and hinders progress towards a more equal society.

Furthermore, Peterson criticizes CRT for its emphasis on social justice and equity, arguing that these concepts can lead to the suppression of free speech and the imposition of ideological conformity. He believes that the pursuit of equality should be based on individual rights and opportunities, rather than group-based outcomes.

A Critique of Peterson’s Perspective

While Peterson raises valid concerns about certain aspects of Critical Race Theory, his critique often oversimplifies and misrepresents the framework. CRT does not deny the importance of individual responsibility or merit; rather, it seeks to understand how systemic racism can limit opportunities for certain racial groups.

Moreover, Peterson’s argument against group identity overlooks the historical and social context in which racial inequality persists. CRT recognizes that race is a social construct that has real consequences for individuals and communities. Ignoring these realities can perpetuate the status quo and hinder progress towards a more equitable society.

Additionally, Peterson’s concerns about free speech and ideological conformity are not unique to CRT. These are broader issues that exist within any academic or political discourse. It is important to engage in open and respectful dialogue to address these concerns, rather than dismissing an entire framework.


In conclusion, Jordan Peterson’s critique of Critical Race Theory raises important questions about the balance between individual responsibility and systemic factors in addressing racial inequality. However, his arguments often oversimplify and misrepresent the framework, failing to acknowledge the complexities of race and racism in society.

It is crucial to engage in nuanced and informed discussions about Critical Race Theory and its implications. By understanding the strengths and limitations of this framework, we can work towards a more inclusive and equitable society.

Call to Action:

Join the conversation and share your thoughts on Critical Race Theory and Jordan Peterson’s critique. How do you believe we can address racial inequality while upholding individual responsibility? Let’s work together to find common ground and create positive change.

Leave a Comment